for the m-th eigenstate, Eq. ( pT|) leads to the expression /.(„)- .^-fc^l) , (28) which, in turn, implies l s = l^, where l s is the localization length of the asymptotic packet (defined from the probability amplitude, i.e. taking the square root of Eq. (|2"B|)). However, this result is inconsistent with the numerical data for the KR which instead indicate that l s ~ 2/oo |yj. To explain the latter result, it was suggested to take into account the large fluctuations of the eigenstates around their shape, 1 / 1 771 — Tl I \ fm(n) = exp Vimn) , (29) where £ mn is a Gaussian noise with the zero mean and a variance [II], < (A£ m „) 2 > = D 3 \m-n\, D s ~ 1//^ . (30) By inserting the Ansatz ( p9|) in Eq. (|27|) and averaging over the noise term, it was found that ( \n — m\\ (\(Pm{n)\) ~expl I , (31) 22 implying that the linear average yields a different localization length compared to (|28|). By repeating the same calculations for the expression (p7[), one obtains that f s ~ exp(\n— no\/loc,), which is found to be in agreement with the numerical results for the KR model as it implies l s = 21^. However, relation (f27|) implies that the average < |0 m (n)| 2 > should be used rather than {\4>m(n)\). In such a case, the result is which implies that f s ~ exp(\n — nol/2/oo). The correctness of this expression is confirmed by the relation l s = 41^ that it implies. B. Numerical data In order to determine the asymptotic shape of the wave packet, we have followed the evolution of an initially 5-like packet for times t > 120ti> The distribution f s (n) has been then obtained by averaging over more than 150 realizations for several 6-values in the range b = 4 12. The results are reported in Fig. 8 with the by-now-standard scaling hypothesis, f s (x) = b 2 f s (n), x = n/b 2 , (33) that is once more confirmed by the good data collapse. A peculiarity of all our simulations is that f s (no) is larger than the neighboring values by approximately a factor 3. The reason of this apparent anomaly can be traced back to the specific 5-like shape of the initial packet (that implies Eq. (|27|)) and to the spatial random structure of the eigenvectors. Indeed, the latter assumption, together with the observation that only a finite number L of channels effectively contribute to the sum in Eq. (p7|), leads to /.(no) « L ( V \n )) ; f s (n + n ) « L 2 (

oo; (ii) exhibits a
diffusive behaviour, for times of the order t ~ b 2 \ (iii) finally, for times larger than to > b 2 ,
stops spreading remaining asymptotically localized.
The scaling properties of the spread of the packet are different in the ballistic (see
Eq. ([TOD) and diffusive (see Eq. flT2"|)) regime. Beyond the ballistic regime, we propose
the heuristic formula (|16|) to effectively describe both the diffusive spreading and the even-
tual saturation. The most interesting feature of Eq. (|i~6|) is the prediction of a power-law
convergence of the wavepacket width M to its asymptotic value, the deviation going to zero
as 1/t 13 with (3 ~ 0.8. The parameter (3 accounts for the repulsion between those eigenstates
which are effectively excited by the initial wavepacket. More precisely, the slow convergence
of M is attributed to effect of Mott states, that are expected to give eventually rise to a
logarithmic time dependence, that cannot be numerically observed.
The "short" time diffusive regime has been investigated by computing dM/dt when a
small amount of time- dependent disorder was superimposed to the quenched disorder. As
a result we found that the diffusion coefficient in dimensionless units is approximately four
times larger than the localization length, after averaging over the energy dependence. The
presence of noise with strength g 2 of the order of a critical value g 2 r ~ 1/6, destroys quantum
coherence and recovers classical diffusion.
Another issue addressed in this paper concerns the fluctuations of the size of the packet
over different time scales. We found that for both diffusive and saturation time scales,
the relative amplitude of the fluctuations scales as fi = AM/M ~ l/b v where 77 ~ 0.7.
We confirmed this law by taking the Fourier power spectrum |[/(c